It is important for coaches to build relationships with their athletes in any sport but can those relationships become detrimental? Imagine partaking in the same routine for a prolonged period of time and then suddenly have it stopped, what would you do to cope? That is the predicament of the Manchester United Football Club, a solid relationship built between Sir Alex Ferguson and his players for his 27 years and then to have it shattered by his retirement; it's quite similar to the circumstances of an orphaned child whether it be by death or abandonment. It is the attachment of those players to Sir Alex that has kept them alive for so long. The bond that he built with that club and those players, I believe will never be matched, but is that such a bad thing? In a sport where trophies count, was such a fall from glory really worth it?
David Moyes came along and attempted to fill these enormous shoes and couldn't but was it really his fault? Can he be blamed for the decline in performance of this prestigious club? I think not. With respect to Attachment Theory, in Harlow's experiment with the rhesus monkeys, Moyes would be seen as the "mother"only providing sustenance, and in the end, it was shown that sustenance just wasn't enough; his coaching abilities couldn't keep MUFC at the top of the table. But in relation to Sir Alex, the mother that provided comfort and warmth was the one that the monkeys clung to. Perhaps the players are holding on to what was rather than embracing what is. The fact of the matter is that they have to move on and rebuild.
This change won't come in one season, maybe not even two but as long as they can re-focus, there is no doubt that they will again once be a force to reckon with. I empathize with Moyes but maybe another manager would come and prove once again that the Red Devils are just an average team with average players who reaped success through the brilliance of their former manager.
~Dawn~
Comments
Post a Comment